Entscheidungsorientierter Vergleich
Richard Mille RM 11-03 Automatic Flyback Chronograph vs AP Royal Oak Offshore Chronograph 26470
Ein praktischer Sammlervergleich zwischen Richard Mille RM 11-03 Automatic Flyback Chronograph und AP Royal Oak Offshore Chronograph 26470, mit Fokus auf Markttiefe, Tragbarkeit, Servicerisiko und langfristige Begehrlichkeit.
Option A
Richard Mille RM 11-03 Automatic Flyback Chronograph
- Eingeführt
- 2016
- Gehäuse
- 50.0mm
- Werk
- Calibre RMAC3 (flyback, annual calendar, 60h)
- Marktpreis
- $220k–$400k+
Vorteile
- Status symbol of modern wealth
- Carbon TPT case = 75g total weight
- Annual calendar + flyback chrono + GMT
Nachteile
- Wears very large (50mm)
- Resale prices have softened post-2022
- Service is RM-network only
Option B
AP Royal Oak Offshore Chronograph 26470
- Eingeführt
- 2014
- Gehäuse
- 42.0mm
- Werk
- Calibre 3126/3840 (auto chrono)
- Marktpreis
- $45k–$120k depending on dial/case
Vorteile
- 1/5 the price of RM
- Established design icon since 1993
- Mature service network
Nachteile
- Wears thick
- Mega-tapisserie dial isn't for everyone
Fazit
Offshore for genuine watchmaking value. RM for ultra-modern status and weight (literally) on the wrist.